The international association of independent democrats against authoritarian regimes
  The Institute of Strategic and Analytical Studies of East Europe, Central Asia, Caucasus
 

The Institute of Strategic and Analytical Studies of East Europe, Central Asia, and Caucasus has researchers in countries of   East Europe, Central Asia, and Caucasus.

The large analysis by Mr. Karbalevich* (with my version)  ---                                                   THE VERDICT for the DICTATOR  LUKASHENKO

 

2015 year - Dictator Lukashenko said: “NEVER!”

"And most importantly, if we talk about your conceptual suggestions - I do not want to create a bourgeois or bourgeois-democratic society, that will have the gap between rich, read, our businessmen, entrepreneurs, maybe some officials (bureaucrats) and so on, against the ordinary people . It is this chasm that will necessarily lead to the scandal, as a minimum. At most, we will have the revolution (we had it )

 The society will have the destabilisation, and maybe even earlier,  we will repeat the Ukrainian version "--- said the dictator to  his premier-minister.

 

 

Why “NEVER”

 

1).The syndrome “Gorbacev reforms’

Gorbachev,  he started  the transformation  for the democracy for the effective system of USSR, but the result was the destruction of USSR.

The President Eltsin , after the democratic reforms ( for the market economy) had the minimal support by Russian peoples.

 

2) Market reforms need the large economic freedom. But the economic freedoms open the civil freedoms yet.  It is the big danger for the dictatorship.

 

Market reforms require expansion of the economic freedom.

This increases public areas that are beyond the government control, and  that maybe result the demands for the  political changes. It can start a chain reaction, which he, the DICTATOR, will not be able to control.

3)

The result of the market economy reforms in Russia and Ukraine demonstrated:

we see a new class- --  oligarchs ,  they , very rich men start  the their  influence  to the state policy. They construct the politic parties, their fraction in the parliament, their private media ….. Oligarchs take the power!

 

The dictator Lukakasheno doesn’t wishes , cannot ( with his psychology)  gives  his power to anybody. The life of Lukashenko  is the power absolute . We see it with 21 years.

 

4)

If Lukashenko will start reforms, he admits the truth of the political opposition. And there is a logical question: why do you, the DICTATOR, 21 years, led the country in the wrong direction?

 

 

5)                                                                                                                                    Market reforms require changes of the image of  Lukashenko (his ideological picture).

It will be necessary to change the ideological paradigm, change the idea of ​​ “The order and  The stability “  to  “the  developing idea” (the  real modernisation) , to change the  image of “The  conservator and  The guardian of the old system´ - to  the image of  “the modernizer”.  But it is same the medicine sex change operation!

 

 

6)

 He must be change  his electorate! ( for reforms)

 

 Today (and before) he has his main and reliable social support by social outsiders, that is the people who are not able to fit into a market economy. Pensioners, the rural population, workers of state enterprises…..  It was the electorate of the dictator for 20 years.

 

The new electorate (  an youth, the small business, the national intelligence persons,  etc. ) will not support the dictator.  But the old electorate will not support the dictator after reforms more.

 

 

The general conclusion: The dictatot Lukashenko cannot lives without  the “ the hand direction” ,( without the power absolute)  for all and for everybody.

Lukashenko life is the power absolute or the death!

 

 

Dr.Valery Hrytsuk, analyst (* Mr.Karbalevich is the political observer of the independent media, Minsk ; the original text is in Belarusian) 

 

P.S. I said about “Never” of Alexander Lukashenko at 1994, but my opinion has been published  at 2003 with HDIM OSCE.






==================================================================

We have the analyses about   authorities and a opposition.

The Democratisation of ………: Myth or Reality?

We know the real situation.

 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The Democratisation of Belarus: Myth or Reality?

                                          It is the Myth only.

 BELARUS  will not have the Democratisation at the dictator of Lukashenko. He afraid any  Democratisation.

The opinion of Lukashenko about the democracy and Human Rights in his speech at 23 April 2009.

Lukashenko said -- There is not the Democratisation. It is VERY ENOUGH.

 "We have the democracy very enough."

"Политической либерализации у нас предостаточно"

Therefore this a crawl counterrevolution will not coming  in Belarus.

Поэтому вот эта «ползучая контрреволюция», говоря старым языком, в Беларуси не пройдет. 

The dictator afraid the word "Democratisation" he has said " political liberalisation"  Lukashenko said about "political liberalisation"  that it is be very enough.

But first of all Lukashenko said about the liberalisation of economic life.

  Only  with the dictator method!

 

 

 

 

 
  Today, there have been 4 visitors (6 hits) on this page!  
 
This website was created for free with Own-Free-Website.com. Would you also like to have your own website?
Sign up for free